So, you want to buy a solar battery but have no clue where to start? Need help in working out what’s right for you? Or perhaps you have an idea but dont know what all the terms mean?
In this guide we will take you through the basics of what you need to know before buying a battery, we will keep the information light but cover the important points:
How much storage do you need?
Simple question, if you know the answer you can just switch to our calculator here. If not, what you will need is an idea of how much power you are trying to store. You need to work this out in kWh (kilowatt hour) or if a small system, in terms of Wh (watt hour). If you are new to this concept or unsure, consider the following, note the bold text stating battery type:
Define your needs – What are you trying to do?
Go completely off grid?
- If you are going completely off grid then your battery becomes critical. It needs to not only store your daily consumption, but also needs to store days where your solar (assuming solar system) are underperforming due to weather. Some people try to offset the poor weather days by adding a small wind turbine to the system. As a concept this is feasible only if you are in a good wind region but for a number of people this simply isn’t an option.
- If you have no existing electricity bill, you will need to asses your off grid requirements by doing the horrible task of a manual energy audit. This is that nasty boring task where you write up your list of power drawing devices that you intend to add to the system. The format is best done on excel for easy calculation like in our Energy Assessment Calc Sheet. The objective being to tabulate your worst possible consumption scenarios and design from there.
- Another design consideration is whether you have access to Eskom/Utility/Generator but are choosing not to use it. At present it is still cheaper to utilise either of these resources as a back up to days without good energy generation due to weather. Thus even though you may be able to size bad days these into your battery bank, you should consider to rather use existing linked sources.
- SUGGESTED BATTERY TYPE 3 OR 4
Go Partially Off Grid?
- Everything starts somewhere. This system typically is designed to keep your power bill down by utilising the PV/Wind sources during daytime for both power and charge, it will also have a small battery bank on it to lean on in the event of a load shed/power interruption. The difference with this battery system and a typical load shed or UPS style system is that it is designed to power your entire load. Commonly the battery will form a part of integrated use, meaning that its cycled daily on the system. Battery requirements are generally larger but unlike an off grid system power sources are freely available between Eskom/Utility or RE power source.
- So how much power required on store? Generally speaking you would do one of the following things:
- Use an Energy Owl or other power meter to determine hourly consumption. Then calculate the number of hours you would want to be on battery in terms of kWh.
- Use your electricity bill as a guideline. Either take the entire electrical load for the day (meaning an entire day on store) or take a partial amount by roughly calculating the total days kWh and dividing it by number of usable hours in a day. i.e. Not 24 hours because you sleeping most of it, use 12 or 16 hours. Its entirely up to you.
- Experience guideline: A house using 25kW per day is right at the top end of what is financially feasible for a battery system. Naturally you can power any amount but its far easier and cheaper to reduce your power via solar geyser, some LED’s etc. Alternatively use your PV during the day to reduce your bill and add on a decent sized battery system to take care of power outs etc.
- SUGGESTED BATTERY TYPE 2 OR 3
UPS or Anti Load/Power Shed System?
- Maybe the most commonly bought system in the entire country during the 2015 blackouts. This system typically will power targeted systems? Lights, TV, Alarm or will cover at least 2 – 3 hours of total load. In some cases the system is cut into the DB board, in others it’s just an inverter with a battery and an extension lead covering a single place in the house.
- To size this system you simply need to determine the number and power consumption of the items added to it. You can use the Energy Assessment Calc Sheet to work this out. Remember a system like this is not designed to power the entire house, if it is then you should be looking at a partial off grid as above. These systems are typically target orientated.
- SUGGESTED BATTERY TYPE: 1 OR 2
SUMMARY – First select the type of system you want. It’s the first step in selecting the battery type and characteristics. Remember, once you have your total storge requirement you can just jump over to our Solar Battery Sizer and it will do all the work for you.
Battery Types and Characteristics
I am going to break with norms here and talk plainly. The internet is rife with in depth articles regarding batteries, so the objective here is not to repeat that but rather to put the important terms in human language. On the previous page I mentioned SUGGESTED BATTERY TYPE. See below:
Battery Type 1: 1 – 2 Year Battery
This battery is your typical cheap lead acid class battery. They come in numerous shapes and sizes but in general they are rated 100Ah, 105Ah, 120Ah, 200Ah and 230Ah. Their brands are Excis, Narada, Maximus, Deltec, Royals etc. Do not get your expectations up with these type of batteries. They do the job but nothing more. Since batteries of this type of used commonly in UPS or Load Shed systems its important to look at the C Rating. C Ratings are the rating at which a battery will give up power over a specific time period. Hence a 100Ah 12v C20 rated battery is designed to give up 100Ah over a period of 20 hours. This may not work well for you, as its short term requirements may beep out the inverter when it demands more than the battery is capable of yielding. Try to work out your system bearing this in mind and ALWAYS check the C5 (5hour) or less rating for best results.
Battery Type 2: 2-3 Year Battery
This is a very narrow band of batteries currently occupied by the Trojan non RE class battery or entry level Lead Crystal and early SonX Gel/AGMs.
They are a good battery, but cycled to 50% the life span just doesn’t have the legs. They do much better when cycled to 30% (my preference) but generally systems and budget limit this option. Typical sizes for this are 150Ah, 180Ah, 200Ah, 225Ah and some 250Ah although the AGM/Gels start at 100Ah, voltages vary between 6v and 12v. Most golf cars make use of this type of battery.
Battery Type 3: 3-5 Year Battery
You have now entered the domain of the true renewable batteries. This is all the Trojan RE/T20 batteries, your Omnipower (on the lower side) and Sonic (on the top side). Although batteries like this start in 100Ah generally most people buying this are going for the larger 200’s or 250Ah, the Trojan class will push these right up 820Ah but pricing starts becoming a little silly.
They are good, durable and can take a real pounding. Excellent recovery windows and long float lives.
Battery Type 4: 8-12+ Year Battery
These batteries are typically 2v cells assembled to whatever your voltage requirement is. In this class is also the LifePO4 and the famed Tesla battery. You do of course get 12v LifePO4 but at the time of writing this the pricing makes the LifePO technology rather stupid. It would be far smarter for you to buy in cheaper batteries and wait for the economics of scale to play a role than invest in LifePO technology. Tesla may be a great brand and if you have money to waste then it may be what you are looking for but alternatively should you want to buy smart than go with the 2v cells.
Typical brands that are notable are Willard RTs, Deltec XILFs, Raylite M classes and Hoppecke. They are all expensive, the list was in a way put in financial order. Even though they require maintenance and some TLC they really really last, if you have the spare cash they make an excellent buy.
Notes and Terminology
Battery C Rating – This is the rate, expressed as a time (usually hours) that a battery is discharged relative to its maximum capacity. You need to start looking at this when buying batteries because aside from the technical implications, many salespeople will fool you into thinking you are getting more than what you are paying for. A good example of this is the Omnipower 260Ah. It’s rated at C100, meaning that it is designed to yield 260Ah if drawn over a period of 100 hours. Your invoice will reflect Omnipower 260Ah and you will think you getting quite a bit of juice(power) but its rating in a renewable energy system (C10) is actually 200Ah. Big difference when you consider what you paying for it.
Battery Types – There are many batteries not mentioned here. I actually felt quite bad leaving them out. Batteries like U.S Lead, Sonneschein etc definitely worthy of mention but I am focusing on commonly used low cost batteries or high volume batteries.
I hope that I have managed to assist you in some way. The important part is determining your needs in terms of what kind of system you are trying to build. Then working out how much storage in terms of kilowatt hour that you need. You can then jump over to our solar battery sizer to work out the amps and other factors. Once completed, take a read through the Battery Types, take in a few of the names and start hunting around for prices. Good luck:)
We are being misled by the Minister of Energy, Eskom and the entire IPP program. Today we were informed that a 100 megawatt plant cost them 62 billion rand. Sadly, this is probably true. BUT. The reason why it cost so much money is due to the very people that are now complaining about the cost of it and even worse, using it as platform to justify the use of nuclear power.
Here is why.
Eskom has stalled signing a power purchase agreement citing increasing costs (see: http://www.iol.co.za/business/companies/eskom-stalls-ipp-deal-as-costs-escalate-2062801 ) . They are correct in their assessment regarding the pricing of the project and the overall net cost to consumer/eskom over the course of its proposed 20-year life span. They state that the project will cost consumer/eskom 62 billion rand. 62 Billion Rand?? The numbers are simply ludicrous. Yet Eskom not only is compelled to basically sign off on it but in addition to which has signed off on many similar deals. How is this even possible? How is it possible that a solar plant and its intended output could cost so much?
I am in the solar business. Frequently I get requested to design solar plants from 10kW through to 150mW. I am completely in touch with pricing regarding hard equipment costs and installation costs. So to put you in perspective. Even on a retail level, the cost of 100mW, with top end equipment, on current exchange rates and fully installed with generous income figures costs only R1 958 692 149. In a nutshell. It costs R2 billion rand. This means that you could build one new plant every year for 62 years and it would cost what they are being charged for a single plant. Bare in mind also, that the cost of power production is free since it is powered by the sun. Add to that some ongoing costs for maintenance and cleaning, it in no way does it come anywhere near the figures been proposed by Eskom. So how did we get into this position?
It all started when the IPP programme was first created. Some geniuses came up with the application vetting process. You had to pay R15 000 just to download the documentation for bid submission. Once downloaded you were met with an onslaught of regulations and requirements. The few big problems with this document became immediately apparent. First. You had to have experience in similar scale projects. Now think about that. This is the first project of its type ever in this country’s history and yet, you had to have experience with these projects. Immediately almost every South African company that once celebrated the launch of the programme was discounted from participation completely. Second. The government did try to include South African companies by forcing local content requirements. This itself was almost farcical. There has never been a scale photovoltaic manufacturer in this country that was 100% South African owned, ever. All plants locally are assembly plants and foreign companies. The same is true for the inverters, there is zero scale manufacturers locally. Finally, perhaps been aware of the document shortfalls they included a BEE (Black Economic Empowerment) component. This was partially successful but the aforementioned criteria meant that they were getting a tiny segment of its true potential. Third. The financial modelling requirements and engineering requirements placed on each potential plant by the government meant that only seriously large engineering firms could really participate. Again another blow to the local industry. Fourth and finally. The cost just of the submission process, with its requirements for EIA approvals, grid proximity, permissions, financial modelling, engineering designs meant that the cost, aside from your downloaded documents (R15k), were so ludicrously expensive that only foreign banks, some well-connected local banks and extremely wealthy individuals had the resources to pay all the costs and gamble on getting nominated as a winning bid.
I still recollect going to the opening of the IPP program at a launch at Gallagher estate in JHB. On arrival the first thing that struck me was how many foreigners there were. It was like a Turkish bazaar and huddled in a small group standing in the corner were literally a handful of South Africans. I still asked the NERSA representatives what the point was of making a programme that no South African could really participate in. No answer.
So, along with a document like this we need to make some concessions. There is a legitimate requirement for safety both in power production and in stability of the grid. There is also a need to have certainty that what you are buying is going to work and has some beneficiation components built into it with all the correct permissions. However, not in the way this was done and not to the detriment of all electrical consumers and local firms. All this has achieved is a negative view on solar power being costly and created a basis on which our minister can drive in nuclear power.
How should this of been done?
Simple. Eskom builds its own solar plants. I know right. Sounds crazy but if they didn’t outsource this requirement to fat wealthy foreign companies and businessmen, we wouldn’t have found ourselves in this position. Why? Because I am stating a fact. It is completely factual that 100mW of solar power should only cost 2 billion rand, we are paying more because we have been ripped off. Eskom could have saved PLENTY and would have been able to benefit local communities for cleaning and maintaining the systems thereby creating work NOT benefits. Even if the system underperformed there is no substitute for FREE electricity. It’s free. No input costs of coal, uranium or natural gas, it makes power every day the sun shines. It is mathematically mind numbing that you could even for a second believe that any other type of power type could ever be cheaper (or faster to build) then renewable energy because it has none of the aforementioned costs. In an ideal world. We would do the following:
Build our own solar panels. Most local companies import from Q Cell in China and assemble so why not make a South African solar panel, call it sunshine in whatever language you like and create a local industry. Then, direct investment into local inverter manufacturing firms, firms like Microcare SA or MLT Drives and get them to scale up operations and create grid scale inverters. They have such brains behind them it’s ludicrous that they are dredging in the back waters behind all this imported product. More importantly they employ local people already by the arm load and would need to employ thousands more to keep up with the demand. Then stop exporting our freaking copper to China and manufacture locally, also manufacture solar cable, mounts and connectors. It’s really not that hard. We are not talking about splitting an atom, we are talking about stranding wire. Then free up the grid. Stop trying to tax local consumers with petty income derived from the sale of electricity. Allow consumers to put power into the national grid with safety standards in place but no requirements for net metering or ongoing costs. If the value of generation from solar power sources surpassed grid demand, then allow them to keep it for free. You do not have to pay them out. You just have to allow them to offset their bills. Most importantly. Should any of this idea be adopted and Eskom finally wakes up to the power of renewable energy. I only then ask that they stop charging consumers for power that they obtain freely from the sun/wind/ocean. They can charge a rate for maintenance but let the consumer enjoy the benefits obtained from free power. Money left in the consumer’s pocket stays in the economy and more importantly provides a break for companies that are already reeling under electricity costs.
If that sounds crazy to you lets just bare in mind that Chile generated so much power from their RE systems that they gave their citizens in some areas free electricity for roughly 192 days, almost two thirds of a year. (http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/chile-solar-power-panels-free-electricity-give-it-away-a7063131.html ) Their problems are slightly different now as a result because albeit that some consumers got cash windfalls, the developers of those plants are struggling to get a return on their investments. For this reason, we need to completely exclude middle men or third party suppliers and do it directly as a national project.
If the concept of free power is not sufficiently enticing to you then consider this. All forms of fossil fuel power generation require water. This in a time when farmers are facing massive losses due to drought (http://yourneighbourhood.co.za/impact-of-water-shortage-in-south-africa/) and the department of water affairs estimates that we could be in serious water crises by 2030. Is this really responsible? Especially when you consider the impact that the latest coal fire plant Medupi is going to have (http://www.bdlive.co.za/opinion/columnists/2013/07/24/little-water-for-a-thirsty-medupi) . That’s an astronomical amount of water that could be utilised for the production of food/drinking water, but instead will get spent on power generation. At present the water consumption average for all power in South Africa is roughly 1.32Litres per kilowatt hour?? In other words, they utilise more water to generate power than the power they produce, take a look at a production graph from Eskom themselves:
If you are unimpressed with the water argument what about CO2 emissions? In a time of world uncertainty regarding climate change, our agreement to the global carbon emissions protocol, our implied carbon tax that looms over the horizon. How on earth could we even consider other types of power sources. At present, Eskom produces power at 0.99 kg of coal per kilowatt hour of energy. Think about it. That’s 1.32L of water and 0.99kG of coal just for 1 measly kilowatt hour of electricity.
For those of you thinking that nuclear is a better option because it’s cleaner. Let me assure you that, albeit that nuclear is in fact cleaner in the way it produces power, it ceases to be cleaner when you incorporate the massive levels of CO2 emissions generated both with the mining and transporting of uranium. Then if you also take into account the absolute wasteland created from their water emissions and the unavoidable mess of nuclear waste disposal, I question myself how on earth it’s possible that we could even consider any other source other than RE.
I hope that I have not bored you with this document. I will be more than happy to supply you with source documentation on costs of solar plants down to current quotations received for the imported equipment. Solar power is not a scary creature of science; it is a simple mechanical truth that has for too long been over engineered. There are countless local systems already feeding into the grid. Systems put up by the average man. It does not require some massive degree of genius to achieve why over pay for it, FREE THE GRID.